In the show “Shark Tank”, a key lesson from watching entrepreneurs get grilled by Kevin O’Leary and company is the importance of knowing your numbers. The questions are always the same, so showing up unprepared is, frankly, inexcusable. What are your revenues? Costs? Margins? Projections?

The same is true when analyzing local wood markets and back-testing timber forecasts within North America’s forest products industry. Previous posts highlight the importance of confirming the current industry structure, the physical facts on the ground with respect to local supplies and demand, and the role of technology in processing wood and growing trees.

Understanding the current situation – knowing your numbers – in wood procurement and timberland management includes answering the question, “does your wood market balance?” When I ask this, folks often think first of matching forest growth to wood demand and estimating growth-to-drain ratios. However, the question of balance speaks more to the mix and match of mills and wood users. Different wood processing facilities have different needs, economics and strategies. A healthy timber market includes strong, growing demand for wood across a balanced “portfolio” of mill types. Failing to account for the explicit balance can throw off the analysis of a wood basket or timberland portfolio.

Consider markets in the U.S. South, for example. Overall, a given wood basket benefits from having a balance – within spitting distance of 50-50 – of grade-using and pulpwood-using mills. The economics and current physical realities of timberland management require markets for sawlogs and pulpwood in nearly equal proportions, in addition to the ability to consume manufacturing residuals (chips). In markets unbalanced to sawlogs (with less relative pulpwood demand), history highligts efforts to recruit or start bioenergy projects, locate chip mills or build OSB plants. In markets heavy to pulpwood consumption, we tend to find more in-woods chipping capacity, as pulp mills and biomass power plants have access to fewer manufacturing residuals.   Markets seek a path to balance, even if it takes several years.

Understanding balance locally and regionally informs our analysis and projections of timber, lumber, panel and bioenergy markets. For this reason, we allocate most of our resources to confirming knowable facts on the ground related to mill investments, forest supplies, technological advances, logging capacities and ownership trends. Knowing the number of mills and localized capacity by end product provides a means to project industry performance from the bottom up. And a lack of balance can highlight factors driving prices locally.

 

For investors, analysts and wood procurement professionals evaluating wood and timber markets, Forisk offers “Timber Market Analysis” on July 13^h in Atlanta. For more information and to register, click here.