| no comments in Forest Strategy, Timber Market Analysis, Wood Bioenergy, Wood Demand & Procurement

Four Lessons from Wood Pellets on Risk and Timber Market Analysis

In the forest industry, where capital investments and forest management plans span decades, we benefit by understanding wood markets and technologies as they actually function. This helps clarify risks and provide context for emerging wood demand from new applications and end markets. Over the past decade, we developed a point of view and set of insights for understanding emerging markets based on tracking the wood bioenergy sector.

The tight margins and global markets for wood pellets distinguish it from other forest products. In North America, over 90% of lumber, OSB and plywood production get consumed in the U.S. and Canada, while three out of four pellets (76%) get shipped out by ocean-crossing exporters. Here are four lessons from our bottom-up research into wood bioenergy relevant to evaluating risk and to providing context for capital investment decisions.

  • Have a simple screening and ranking process to separate speculative projects from viable investments. This approach applies to assessing “at-risk” mills and the suitability of wood baskets for timber investment and capacity expansions.
  • Connect wood markets to end markets to assess strategic advantage. The simple math of “distance to mill” or “distance to customer” along with gross margins and the ability-to-pay for wood provide a framework for strategic analysis.
  • Understand what drives capacity changes and consolidation to leverage and track the compounding benefits of technology and scale in the forest products industry across regions in North America.
  • Communicate with context to provide the best possible guidance to your teams and clients, while also role-modeling what we expect from others. We must be “on guard” and disciplined as consumers and disseminators of analysis


Without a structured approach to ordering the world, the world will impose its views on us. The fact is some things are more important than others, some things are easily verifiable, and some things depend on others. We have “nice to have” and “need to have.” There are “necessary” conditions and “sufficient” conditions. Simple processes help us sort the mess and prioritize.

Click here to read and download the complete Q1 2019 Forisk Strategy Note on this research.

Leave a Reply

← Back to blog